Tag Archives: Advocate Health Care in Chicago

Accountable Care Organisations in the USA and England (King’s Fund / BBC News)

Posted on March 30, 2014 by Dementia and Elderly Care News

Summary This King’s Fund report investigates Accountable Care Organisations (ACOs) in the United States and England. The relevance of ACOs for integrated care initiatives in England are assessed. “In the United States, accountable care organisations ACOs – a group of … Continue reading →

Posted in Charitable Bodies, Commissioning, Community Care, For Carers (mostly), For Doctors (mostly), For Nurses and Therapists (mostly), For Researchers (mostly), For Social Workers (mostly), Integrated Care, International, King's Fund, Management of Condition, National, Patient Care Pathway, Person-Centred Care, Personalisation, Practical Advice, Quick Insights, Standards, UK, Universal Interest | Tagged Abolition of the Purchaser/Provider Split, Accountability, Accountable Care Communities (ACCs), Accountable Care Organisations, Accountable Care Organisations (ACOs), ACO Eligibility Criteria, ACO Models, ACO-Type Organisations, Active Engagement, Advocate Health Care in Chicago, Affordable Care Act (Office of Legislative Counsel 2010), Ageing Population, Ageing Society, Balance Between Care by Specialists and Generalists, Barriers to Integration, BBC Health News, Benefits of Integrated Care, Better Care Fund, Better Care Fund (BCF), Budgets, Care by Specialists and Generalists, Care Integration, Care Management, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.), Chronic Illnesses, Clinical Leadership, Co-operative Network in Rural North Dakota, Collaborative Care, Collaborative Care Teams, Collaborative Models of Delivery, Collaborative Working, Commissioning Support Tools, Community Care of North Carolina, Conditions for Integration, Cost and Quality Measures, Enablers of Integrated Care, Engagement, England, Evolution of ACOs, Financial Fragmentation in the NHS, Fragmentation of Services and Commissioning, Fragmented Care, Fragmented Resource Allocation, Geisinger Health System in Western Pennsylvania, GP Commissioning in the NHS in England, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound Washington State, Health and Social Care Integration, Health Care Reform, High Quality Care for All, House of Care Model, Impactability Models, Incentivising Integrated Care, Independent Practice Associations (IPAs), Information Sharing, Innovations in Payment Systems and Contracting, Integrated Care in English NHS, Integrated Delivery Systems, Integration of Health and Social Care, Intermountain Healthcare in Salt Lake City, Investment in Information Technology, Kaiser Permanente, Lessons for England From the US, Long-Term Conditions (LTCs), Macmillan Cancer Support, Massachusetts Alternative Quality Contract (AQC), Mayo Clinic, Medicare, Medicare and Medicaid, Monarch in California, Multi-Specialty Group Practices, Multi-Specialty Teams Across Hospital and Community, Multiagency Teams, Multidisciplinary Teams, Multiple Chronic Disease, Multiple Needs, Multiple-Morbidities, Networks and Alliances, NHS Plan (2000), NHS Reform, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient Engagement, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (US 2010), Patient Targeting and Risk Stratification, Payment by Results, Payment Systems and Incentives, Physician Hospital Organisations (PHOs), Pioneer and the Shared Savings Programme, Pioneer Programme, Population Risk Stratification, Prevention, Preventive Care, Purchaser/Provider Split, Right Outcomes Linked to Incentives, Risk Stratification, Shared Savings Programme, Specific Objectives, Support Tools, Team-Based Approaches, Types of ACOs, United States, USA, Virginia Mason in Washington State, Virtual Physician Organisations (VPOs), Working Arrangements | Leave a comment

Tag Archives: Advocate Health Care in Chicago

Recent Posts

Archives

Categories

Google Translate (100+ Languages)

Recommended Sites