Tag Archives: Buurtzorg (Neighbourhood Care)

Home Care in England: a King’s Fund Review (King’s Fund)

Posted on December 12, 2018 by Dementia and Elderly Care News

Summary A King’s Fund report investigates problems in the commissioning of adult social care with a focus on home care. Issues under consideration include: Recruitment and retention of home care staff. Reductions in fees paid for council commissioned home care. … Continue reading →

Posted in Assistive Technology, Charitable Bodies, Commissioning, Community Care, For Carers (mostly), For Nurses and Therapists (mostly), For Researchers (mostly), For Social Workers (mostly), Integrated Care, King's Fund, Management of Condition, National, Non-Pharmacological Treatments, Person-Centred Care, Quick Insights, Standards, Telecare, UK, Universal Interest | Tagged Adult Social Care, Adult Social Care Funding, Adult Social Care: Local Authority Commissioning, Advancing Better Living for Elders (CAPABLE), Ageing Population, Alternative Approaches to Commissioning, Autonomous Team Working, Buurtzorg (Neighbourhood Care), Buurtzorg Model, Buurtzorg Model: Netherlands, Buurtzorg Nederland, Buurtzorg: Dutch for Neighbourhood Care, Buurtzorg: Netherlands, Care Funding, Carer Marketplaces, Commissioning Home Care, Commissioning Home Care for Older People, Commissioning of Domiciliary Care, Commissioning of Homecare Services, Community Aging in Place, Community Assets, Community Catalysts, Continuity of Care and Relationships, Continuity of Care for Older People, Cooperative Home Care Associates (USA), Delivering Home Care for Older People, Dementia and Homecare, Devon Cares, Devon Cares: Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust, Dignity, Dignity and Respect, Domiciliary Care, English Local Authorities, Geographical Variations, Gesundes Kinzigital Model, Health and Social Care in the Community, Health and Social Care Integration, High-Quality Home Care (Buurtzorg: Netherlands), Home Care, Home Care For Older People: NICE Care Pathway, Home Care For Older People: NICE Quality Standard No.123, Home Care Packages (HCP), Home Care Services, Home Care Standards, Home Care Support, Home Care Workers, Home Care Workforce, Inclusion Glasgow, Independent Living With Care, Individual Service Funds (ISFs), Innovation in Adult Social Care, Integrator Models, Intelligent System for Independent Living and Self-Care of Seniors With Cognitive Problems or Mild Dementia (ISISEMD), Kaiser Telehealth (USA), Kotitori Model, Later Life, Lidköping (Sweden), Local Authorities, Local Community Assets, Local Health Services: Variations, Love2Care Devon, Mountain Empire’s Program of All-inclusive Care for Elderly (PACE), New Models of Care, New Models of Home Care, New Models of Service, Outcomes-Based Commissioning, Personal Budgets (PBs), Place-Based Teams, Provider Sustainability, Quality and Sustainability, Recruitment and Retention, Regional Variations, Scotland National Telecare Development Programme, Shared Lives and Supported Living Schemes, Shared Lives Carers, Somerset Microenterprise Project, St Monica’s Trust, Staying Independent, SuperCarers, Sustainability, Telemonitoring, Tipping Point in Sustainability of Adult Social Care (Alleged), Unacceptable Variations, Values-Based Recruitment, Variations in Quality of Care, Variations in Social Care Quality and Spending in England, Wellbeing Teams | Leave a comment

Flipping Healthcare: a Parallel With Flipping Education? (BMJ / IHI / Healthcare)

Posted on October 8, 2014 by Dementia and Elderly Care News

Summary Two authors from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) have proposed that it might be beneficial to “flip” medical thinking (i.e. introduce a 180º change and turn-around), in order to develop innovative models of care which can improve health … Continue reading →

Posted in Charitable Bodies, Commissioning, Community Care, For Carers (mostly), For Doctors (mostly), For Nurses and Therapists (mostly), For Researchers (mostly), For Social Workers (mostly), In the News, Integrated Care, International, Management of Condition, NHS, Non-Pharmacological Treatments, Patient Care Pathway, Person-Centred Care, Personalisation, Quick Insights, Standards, UK, Universal Interest | Tagged Autonomy and Self-Determination, Barriers to Engagement, Barriers to Involvement, Barriers to Self-Management for People with Dementia, BMJ, British Medical Journal (BMJ), Buurtzorg (Neighbourhood Care), Buurtzorg: Dutch for Neighbourhood Care, Church Health Center (Memphis), Co-Production, Co-Production for Wellbeing, Collaboration, Collaborative Care, Collaborative Care Planning, Collaborative Commissioning, Collaborative Working, Cross-Boundary Care Pathway Redesign, Department of Medicine: Weill Cornell Medical College, Embedding Co-Production, Empowerment, Empowerment and Dementia, Engagement, Family Involvement, Flipping Education, Flipping Healthcare, Healthcare (Journal), IHI: Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Innovation, Innovation and Improvement, Innovative Commissioning, Innovative Models, Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), Integrated and Specialist Teams, Integrated Care Teams, Integrated Teams, Interdisciplinary Teams, Involvement and Participation, Leeds Psychosocial Oncology and Clinical Practice Research Group, Local Empowerment, MDTs: Multidisciplinary Teams, Multiagency Teams, Multidisciplinary Teams in Rehabilitation, Neighbourhood Care, Openness and Collaboration, Partnership and Collaboration, Patient and Public Involvement (PPI), Patient Empowerment, Patient Engagement, Patient Involvement, Patient Reported Outcomes, Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMS), Personal Commissioning (Self-Directed), Power Imbalance, Prevention, Primary Care, Psychosocial Oncology and Clinical Practice Research Group (POCPRG), Psychosocial Oncology and Clinical Practice Research Group: St James' Institute of Oncology, Quality Improvement, Quality Innovation, Quality of Life Research, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center: Los Angeles County, Redesigning Care Pathways, Redesigning Services, Rehabilitation and Self Management, Research Advisory Group (RAG), Self-Care, Self-Determination, Self-Directed Care, Self-Directed Services, Self-Directed Support, Self-Efficacy, Service Redesign, Service User Involvement, St James' Institute of Oncology: University of Leeds, St James’s University Hospital (Leeds), Staff Empowerment, Supported Self-Care, Teamwork, United States, University of Leeds, USA, User Involvement, Weill Cornell Medical College | Leave a comment

Demographic Crisis in Care Provision: Community Responses (BBC News / IPPR)

Posted on April 24, 2014 by Dementia and Elderly Care News

Summary The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) has estimated that the number of older people in England needing care will outstrip the supply of family members able to provide unpaid care by 2017. The IPPR further estimates that by … Continue reading →

Posted in Age UK, BBC News, Charitable Bodies, Commissioning, Community Care, For Carers (mostly), For Nurses and Therapists (mostly), For Researchers (mostly), For Social Workers (mostly), In the News, Integrated Care, Management of Condition, National, Patient Care Pathway, Person-Centred Care, Personalisation, Practical Advice, Quick Insights, Standards, UK, Universal Interest | Tagged Adult Social Care Services, Age and Ageing, Ageing and Society, Ageing Population, Asset-Based Community Development Approach, Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS), Australia, Avoidable Admissions, Avoidable Rehospitalisations, BBC Health News, Benefits of Integrated Care, Better Care Fund (BCF), Building Community Assets, Building Community Capacity, Buurtzorg (Neighbourhood Care), Buurtzorg Model, Buurtzorg: Netherlands, Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, Campaign to Understand Dementia and Build Community Networks, Care Coordinators, Care for People with Dementia in the Community, Care in an Ageing Society, Care in the Community, Care Leave, Caregiving (Carers), Careland Versus Communityland, Carers, Co-Production, Co-Production Issues, Collective Solutions to Care, Combining Work and Care, Community and Voluntary Sector, Community Assets, Community Care, Community Care Services, Community Empowerment, Community Institutions, Community Networks, Costs of Social Care for Older People, Demographic Changes, Demographic Time-Bomb, Demographics, Demography, Direct Payments, Economics of Co-Production, Employment Rights, Empowerment, Familienpflegezeit (Family Caring Time), Families, Family Care Networks, Family Carers, Flexibility, Four Pillars of Caring Society: Family State Market and Community, Generation Strain, Generation Strain: the Care Gap, Germany, Grandparents Service (Grosselterndienst), Health and Social Care Integration, Health and Social Care Services, Housing and Care for Older People, Improving Flexibility of Care, Independence, Informal Networks, Institute for Public Policy Research (ippr), Integrated Care and Support, Integrated Care Coordinators, Integrated Care Services, Integrated Commissioning, Integrated Services, Integration of Health and Social Care for Older People, Intergenerational Cohesion, Inverse Satisfaction Law, ippr: Institute for Public Policy Research, Japan, Leeds, Leeds Neighbourhood Networks, Local Area Coordination, Local Area Coordinators (LACs), Local Authority Case Management, Local Care Coordinators Replacing Local Authority Case Management, Local Government Association: LGA, Local Links, Local Networks, Loneliness and Social Isolation, Maintaining Independence, Multi-Generational Houses (Mehrgenerationenhauser), Mutual Support, Nationwide Caravan to T rain One Million Dementia Supporters, Neighbourhood Networks, Neighbourhood Networks: Leeds, Netherlands, Networks and Alliances, Older Demographics, Participatory Society, Participle’s Circle Project, Peer Support Networks, Personal Budgets (PBs), Preventable Hospital Admissions, Public Agency and Community Empowerment Strategies (PACES), Redesigning Support for Care Leavers, Regaining Independence, Reshaping Care for Older People, Sandwich Generation Caregivers, Senior Network Support (SeNS) Project, Shared Budgets, Social Care for Older People, Social Demographics, Social Isolation, Stamford Forum, Staying Independent, Support for Carers, Support Networks, Time-Banking, TMOs, Unmet Needs, Unpaid Care and Employment, Unpaid Caregivers (Carers), Unpaid Carers, User Networks, Value of Volunteering, Voluntary Sector, Voluntary Sector and Ageing, Voluntary Sector Organisations, Voluntary Sector Provision, Volunteering, Volunteering and Civic Engagement, Volunteering in Health and Care, Walsall, Women’s Association of Berlin (Frauenbund), Working Carers | Leave a comment

Tag Archives: Buurtzorg (Neighbourhood Care)

Recent Posts

Archives

Categories

Google Translate (100+ Languages)

Recommended Sites