Tag Archives: Institutional Boundaries

Reshaping the Workforce: More Thoughts on Staff Engagement (NHS England / Nuffield Trust / BBC News)

Posted on September 15, 2016 by Dementia and Elderly Care News

Summary A recent Nuffield Trust report, commissioned by NHS Employers, discussed providing NHS nursing, community and support staff with additional skills to deliver care, as a means to improving the system’s capacity to cope with increasing (and changing) patient demand. … Continue reading →

Posted in BBC News, Commissioning, For Doctors (mostly), For Nurses and Therapists (mostly), For Researchers (mostly), For Social Workers (mostly), In the News, Integrated Care, Local Interest, Management of Condition, National, NHS, NHS Employers, NHS England, Nuffield Trust, Person-Centred Care, Quick Insights, Standards, UK, Universal Interest | Tagged Advanced Clinical Practitioners (ACPs), Advanced Nurse Practitioners (ANPs), Advanced Roles, Ageing Population, Assistant Practitioners (APs), Associate Practitioners, Barriers to Engagement, BBC Health News, Beyond Institutional Boundaries, Building Trust, Calderdale Framework: Seven Stages, Candace Imison: Director of Policy at the Nuffield Trust, Care Closer to Home, Clinical Engagement, Collaboration: Working Across Boundaries, Community Care, Cross-Sector Partnerships, Culture and Behaviour Change, Culture Change, Dudley, Dudley Multispecialty Community Provider, Efficiency and Effectiveness, Efficiency Opportunities, Employee Engagement, Engagement, Engagement and Co-Production, Engagement on Quality, Extended Roles, Extending Roles, Financial Efficiency, Financial Sustainability in the NHS, Five Year Forward View (NHS England), Front Line Engagement, Haxby Group Practice, Health and Care Innovation Expo, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Holistic Workers in Community Care, Institutional Boundaries, Integration of Health and Social Care, Integration of Primary Secondary and Community Care, Isle of Wight, Link Workers: Visiting Patients at Home, Long-Term Care (LTC), Long-Term Conditions (LTCs), MDTs: Multidisciplinary Teams, Models of Care Across Organisational Boundaries, Multidisciplinary Population-Based Teams, Multidisciplinary Team Care, Multidisciplinary Teams, Multidisciplinary Teamwork, Multimorbidities and Long-Term Conditions, My Life a Full Life (Isle of Wight) Vanguard, New Care Models, New Care Models Programme, New Care Models: Vanguard Sites, New Ways of Working, NHS Culture, NHS Culture Change, NHS Five Year Forward View (5YFV), NHS Health and Care Innovation Expo (2016), Non-Medical Workforce, Northumberland Accountable Care Organisation, Northumberland Accountable Care Organisation (PACS), Nurses and Midwives: Reducing Barriers / Boundaries Across Care Settings, Organisational Boundaries, Paramedic Practitioners, Pharmacy and Primary Care Practitioners, Physician Associates, Positive Engagement, Principles for Engagement, Provider Engagement, Quality and Efficiency Opportunities, Reshaping the Workforce (Nuffield Trust), Satisfaction, Shortages of NHS Front-Line Staff, Six Steps Model, Skill Flexibility, Speed of Trust Methodology, Staff Engagement, Staff Engagement in the NHS, Staff Satisfaction, Staff Training, Teams Without Walls, Terminology For New and Extended Roles, Vanguards: New Care Models Programme, Workforce Satisfaction, Workforce Training, Working Across Boundaries, Yorkshire and Humber: Toblerone Model | Leave a comment

NHS Payment Reform (Nuffield Trust)

Posted on February 23, 2014 by Dementia and Elderly Care News

Summary The NHS payment system has evolved over years into a complex mix of methods, prices, incentives and penalties. It is the product of over a decade of reforms to different components. Aspects of NHS payment systems may act as … Continue reading →

Posted in Acute Hospitals, Charitable Bodies, Commissioning, Community Care, Department of Health, For Doctors (mostly), For Nurses and Therapists (mostly), For Researchers (mostly), For Social Workers (mostly), Integrated Care, National, NHS, NHS England, Nuffield Trust, Patient Care Pathway, Person-Centred Care, Personalisation, Standards, Systematic Reviews, UK, Universal Interest | Tagged 2012/13 Reference Costs, 2014/15 Tariff, 2015/16 National Tariff Payment System, Access to Services, Additional Payments, Alternative Payment Systems, Assessing and Meeting Needs and Payments, Attention Shift, Barriers to Integration, Best Practice Tariffs (BPTs), Beyond Institutional Boundaries, Block Budgets, Budget Management, Budgets, Calculating National Prices, Capitation, Care in Appropriate Settings, Care Settings, Case-Based Payments, Challenges of Reconfiguration, Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts (CNST), COBIC Consortium, Commissioning Acute Care Services, Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN), Commissioning Landscape in England, Commissioning Local Services, Community Health Services, Community-Based Services, Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), Configuration of Services, Cost Benchmarking, Cost Uplifts, CQUIN Incentive Payments, Diagnosis-Related Payments, Differential Efficiency Factors, Direct Enhanced Service (DES) Payments, Disincentives, DRG Payments in European Countries, Efficiency, Efficiency Factor (Costings), Efficiency Savings, Emergency Services, Evolution of Payment by Results in the NHS, Extrinsic Motivation, Fee-For-Service, Fragmentation of Services and Commissioning, Funding GP Practices in England, Funding Reform, Gaming the System, HCHS: Hospital and Community Health Services Needs Index, Health and Social Care Act (2012), Health and Social Care Configuration, Health and Social Care Reform, Health Care Purchased by PCTs (2012/13), Health Reform, Healthcare Resource Groups (HRGs), Hospital Activity, Hospital and Community Health Services (HCHS), Hospital and Community Health Services (HCHS) Needs Index, Hospital Reconfiguration, Inappropriate Care Settings, Incentive Payments, Increasing Efficiency, Institutional Boundaries, Integrated Services, Integrated Whole System Services for People With Dementia, Intrinsic Motivation, Leakage (Efficiency), Length of Stay (LoS), Linking Payment to Quality, Loss of Motivation, Market Forces Factor (MFF), Mental Health and Community Services, Mental Health Services, Modelled Prices, Monitor, Monitoring, National Prices Methodology Discussion Paper, National Tariff Payment System Consultation, NHS Budget, NHS Efficiency Savings, NHS Health and Social Care Act (2012), NHS Hospital and Community Health Service (HCHS) Workforce, NHS National Prices Methodology Discussion Paper: 2015/16, NHS National Tariff Payment System (The Tariff), NHS Payment Reform, NHS Payment System, NHS Payments System, NHS Productivity, NHS Reform, NHS Service Reconfiguration, Openness and Transparency, Organisational Boundaries, Oxfordshire CCG, Patient-Level Information and Costing System (PLICS), Pay-For-Performance Schemes, Pay-For-Performance Schemes in NHS Hospitals, Paying Lower (or Zero) Prices for Activity Above a Specified Level, Payment by Results, Payment by Results (PbR), Payment for Outcomes Not Outputs, Payment Mechanisms, Payment Reform, Payment System for Hospital Activity, Payments to Incentivise Service Transformation, Policy Objectives for DRG Payments, Potential NHS Provider Productivity improvements, Practice by Rote, Price-Setting Principles, Primary and Secondary Care, Primary Care Trusts and Weighted Capitation Formula, Priority Setting (Commissioning), Productivity, Productivity Improvements, Public Service Reform, Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) Payment, Quality Payments in the NHS, Reconfiguration of Emergency Care System, Recovery Rehabilitation and Reablement (RRR), Redesigning Services, Reduced Gaming of the System, Reference Costs, Reform, Seamless Care Between Settings, Secondary Care, Service Development Costs, Service Transformation, Setting Objectives, Short Stay Emergency (SSEM) Bandings, SSEM Bandings, Supplier-Induced Demand, Transparency, Transparency and Accountability, Treatment Function Codes (TFCs), Unintended Consequences, Working Across Boundaries, Working the System and Unintended Consequences | Leave a comment

An Uncertain Age: Reconsidering Long-Term Care (KPMG)

Posted on August 15, 2013 by Dementia and Elderly Care News

[A brief reference to this item features in Dementia and Elderly Care: the Latest Evidence Newsletter (RWNHST), Volume 3 Issue 9, August 2013]. Summary This KPMG International report, commissioned by the Lien Foundation, is an attempt to prompt and inform … Continue reading →

Posted in Assistive Technology, Commissioning, Community Care, For Carers (mostly), For Doctors (mostly), For Nurses and Therapists (mostly), For Researchers (mostly), For Social Workers (mostly), Integrated Care, International, Management of Condition, Non-Pharmacological Treatments, Patient Care Pathway, Person-Centred Care, Personalisation, Quick Insights, Standards, Systematic Reviews, Telecare, Telehealth, UK, Universal Interest | Tagged Adult Social Care Funding, Age and Ageing, Ageing and Long-Term Care: Projections, Ageing Population, Ageing Society, Ageing Well, Agenda for Action, Alternatives to Hospital Admission, An Uncertain Age (KPMG), Attitudes to Ageing, Australia, Beacon Hill Villages, Beyond Institutional Boundaries, Canada, Care Funding, Caregivers, Carers, China, Community Without Walls, Consumer Directed Care (CDC), Demographic Changes, Demographic Time-Bomb, Demographics, Demography, Eden Alternative, Elderly Care, Family Caregivers, Family Carers, Family-Based Care, Finland, France, Future Funding Models, Geriatric Education and Research Institute (Singapore), Geriatric Flying Squad, Germany, Healthy Ageing, Hong Kong, Houston (the Grand-Aides Foundation), Impact of Demographic Change on Public Services, Informal Workforce, Institutional Boundaries, Integrated and Community-Based Care, International Longevity Centre Global Alliance, Japan, Jeremy Porteus, Johns Hopkins University, KPMG, KPMG International, KPMG International Cooperative, Lien Foundation, Long Term Systems for the Elderly, Long-Term Care (LTC), Long-Term Care (LTC) Expenditure, Long-Term Conditions (LTCs), Netherlands, Norway, Paying for Care, Paying for Care and Support, Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE), Proposed Geriatric Education and Research Institute, Senses Framework, Senses Framework (Security; Belonging; Continuity; Purpose; Achievement; Significance), Seven Ways to Better Support Caregivers, Singapore, Social Care Funding, Social Care Workforce, Social Demographics, Social Versus Medical Models of Care, Sustainable Funding, Taiwan, Transforming Care Environments, Tsao Foundation Singapore, UMO (Universal Monitoring) Platform, United States, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Workforce Planning and Development | Leave a comment

Tag Archives: Institutional Boundaries

Recent Posts

Archives

Categories

Google Translate (100+ Languages)

Recommended Sites